svin wrote:Watched a tribute to Cronkite the other night...Interesting that he was named the most trusted man in the country during his time on the nightly news.
There is no way that would happen now, which is a comment both on Cronkite and the way times have changed.
Ahh yes! The unspoken truth. I never "got it" when I was a kid. My parents would watch Huntley Brinkly, then Walter Cronkite back to back every night religiously. I thought it was etched in stone every night when Walter decried, "and that's the way it is"!
My parents never uttered a contrary word, though they were conservative. Yet, I would on occasion hear their descent months later about things that were "not the way they were". It was matter of fact, and not angry. But they knew they were getting hosed by the media, even though they were constantly tuned into the media. They carried that on since the days of WWII, waiting to hear the latest official news. Walter was "official", but apparently not always as trusted as his reputation states by some such as my parents.
Where they got another opinion, I have no idea. I can only attribute it to the fact they had a hard and genuine view of the world.
My first askance view of Walter came when I heard him discredit "live action", or "live on the scene" news. He didn't like that reporters could take control of a story and broadcast live on location. He wanted the anchor, (himself), in control... always.
It was about this time he left his anchor seat. So yes, times have changed. Given the current times, I'm glad that more than one view can be expressed. Under the old guard, that would not ever be allowed.
Walter was king, and I doubt he wanted to hear any viewpoint beyond his own take, imho.